I confirmed with Tiller support that the Fidelity outage while widespread, does not affect all Fidelity accounts. For those using Fidelity just as a brokerage account and not also for cash management, then the missing transaction data is not likely to be meaningful or even noticeable.
Although all of my accounts (checking, cash management, brokerage, etc) are with major institutions like Fidelity, Vanguard, Chase, Wells Fargo, Schwab, etc the frequency and persistence of data feed issues with Tiller has been the worst I’ve ever experienced. This is surprising to me given Yodlee’s market position. I’ve been using personal financial management software since the old manual entry days of Dollars & Sense through to the early days of Quicken. I moved to Mint when it was still in beta (well before the acquisition by Intuit). With Mint, I basically just used it as a data feed using exports to populate my own worksheets. For a free service, Mint was – at least for me – exceptionally reliable with the bank feed data.
I’m continuing to pilot a number of options for the replacement of Mint including Tiller, Empower, etc. For Tiller, I paid the annual fee, which I’m fine with as just a 30 day trial is not a sufficient amount of time for me. I am primarily using my own MS-Excel worksheets, but with Tiller I’m using the foundation template to feed my worksheets, and with others I’m using exports. My point with all of that background is that the other services I’m using have been, as Mint was, flawlessly reliable with the bank data feed. One of these other services uses Yodlee as the data feed provider.
You’re applauding Tiller’s “transparency” while perhaps misunderstanding my main point. My issue with the Institutional Alerts worksheet is, as I mentioned, that it is exceptionally misleading in what it indicates as the “date started” value as it, at least for the issues I’ve been tracking, consistently defaults to new “date started” date with no resolution of the issue having happened. In other words, it grossly misrepresents the actual outage time. The Fidelity outage for me is 10+ days old now. This Fidelity issue was listed in the Tiller worksheet when I initially checked it. I’ve watched over the last week+ as the “date started” value consistently resets to a new date. Under reporting or mischaracterizing outages like this is, in my view, a bad business practice. It has certainly given me less confidence in Tiller as a company.
How much of the bank data feed issues are Yodlee related vs. Tiller related? Why are my bank data feeds for other services (some of which also use Yodlee) so much more reliable than Tiller?
I’m taking the time to post and to work with Tiller support as my strong preference is to use Tiller as the direct to worksheet data feed is ideal for me. I’ve happily paid Tiller $80 for a year of service, which has unfortunately proven to be far less reliable than other free services. Given my experience with Yodlee based data feeds with other services, I’m skeptical that it is just a matter of Tiller adding a different bank data feed option. Thus, again, my ask for more transparency. In my view and based on my own experience, Tiller is characterizing the bank data feed issues as being due to Yodlee, yet other services I’m using that rely on Yodlee are working just fine. Perhaps it is just randomness of how various accounts are effected, but there is a stark contrast in reliability.
I want the paid Tiller service to be successful. I prefer the business model where I pay for the service and can rely on it being there for years to come. I am, however, growing concerned about the situation for the reasons I’ve mentioned above.